Warning: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, null given in /homepages/34/d421143111/htdocs/wordpress2/wp-content/plugins/automatically-paginate-posts/automatically-paginate-posts.php on line 361
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/34/d421143111/htdocs/wordpress2/wp-content/plugins/automatically-paginate-posts/automatically-paginate-posts.php:361) in /homepages/34/d421143111/htdocs/wordpress2/wp-content/plugins/google-apps-login/core/core_google_apps_login.php on line 453 The Battle For Broomhall Rd - Sheffield Cycle Routes & Resources
Broomhall Rd is a leafy avenue passing through the Broomhall conservation area in Sheffield, much loved by John Betjeman amongst others. Unfortunately it had also become a rat-run for drivers wishing to bypass the complex junction system at Brook Hill. The rat-running problem in the northern section of Broomhall was solved by an ingenious traffic management scheme developed in consulation with residents many years ago, but this did leave the southern area vulnerable to traffic. The area is also well used by students, University staff and people taking their kids to nurseries in the area amongst others.
A proposal was made to link the two Sheffield Hallam University (SHU) sites – City and Collegiate – with an enhanced walking and cycling route and this has now been put in place on Broomhall Rd. Making a section of Broomhall Rd one-way with contra-flow cycling means that is still possible to access Clarkehouse Rd but you have to go a longer way round on traffic calmed streets. I think the new route is long enough to discourage rat-running.
The CycleSheffield view as I understand it is that the scheme is not radical enough and all the parking on one side of Broomhall Rd should have been removed to make more space for people walking and on bikes. Their initial response is here.
Personally although I’m never against segregated cycleways I’m not sure the level of traffic on this road, particularly now the level of rat-running has been reduced, warrants segregation.
Complaints about the scheme have focused on two issues – drivers are violating the no entry signs and continuing up Broomhall Rd in the wrong direction and parking has been reduced making it more difficult to drive up to the nursery gates and drop your kids off. It is also alleged that the road is too narrow for contra-flow cycling. Brunswick St however is much narrower than Broomhall Rd and contra-flow cycling works successfully here.
SHU hasn’t covered itself in glory – they seem happy to have the council take the flak for this scheme although it was done at their behest. I’m cross that they have recently closed two of the cut-throughs from Collegiate Crescent to Broomgrove Rd, one possibly temporarily, the other looks permanent. I’ve been using these routes since I lived on Southgrove Rd in the 1970s and they would make a natural extension from the Broomhall Rd route into the Groves, both for walkers and cyclists. They have also annoyed local residents by leaving portakabins in place for teaching, that they said they would remove by 2015.
Traffic doesn’t “have” to take the long way round Collegiate Cres & Park Lane – most of the through traffic is rat-running and should stay on the Ring Road. Alternatively people could just leave their cars at home and use alternative means of transport. I think the long way round route that traffic now has to do is long enough to discourage most drivers from doing it regularly and that as tends to happen, people will get used to it and find alternative routes. There is a bit more traffic on Victoria Rd now but it is in manageable numbers.
The lower section has been narrowed to reduce speeds and the discouragement of rat-running I mentioned previously will I think make a difference to this area.
I quite like the parking areas delineated with brick that they have put in.
Down at the City end, the existing cycle link at the end of Broomhall St (joining the ring road) is still in place and form the link from the Ring Route to the Broomhall Rd route.
Presumably the route will continue along Wellington St – there’s a plan for a plateau over Fitzwilliam St which looks a bit wimpy – the one further up linking to Devonshire St is only a minor improvement & I think CycleSheffield were right to ask for a proper light controlled crossing here. Egerton Walk is shown as a cycle route on the plan but is currently only a footpath. – this area is being resurfaced at the moment. I guess it will all link up once the New Retail Quarter is done.
I hope the council shows resolution and doesn’t make any more than minor amendments to this scheme and then cracks on and sorts out the Clarkehouse Rd problem, of which more later.