Air Quality and Transport in the North

I went to the Campaign for Better Transport meeting with Bridget Fox, a national campaigner with CBT. She really had two big issues to tell us about so I’ll deal with them first. This is in semi-note form so please bear with me – anything you don’t understand please get in touch. 

 

  • Air Quality

 

The big news is the successful Supreme  court judgement in our favour stating that the government is legally liable for its negligence on AQ.

The Campaign to support this should be nationwide  not just London

Cities are likely to be covered but what about smaller towns & rural areas?

What is the extent of the legal requirement?

BF – 80% of emissions are from vehicles. Rest is from old heating systems and diesels on building sites. Particulates can be from braking systems.

  • most buses in the North are diesel.
  • Linked to liveable cities, de-carbonisation.
  • Increasing numbers of players in the space.
  • Breathe Easy groups are growing
  • Large chunks of the country are failing to deliver on air quality
  • Current legislation is unenforced and lenient – enabling rather than mandatory.
  • Lead campaigner is Andrea Lee
  • Poor AQ is “Lethal and illegal”
  • Tests are not effective – see VW.
  • The regulators are In bed with motor manufacturers
  • A new Clean Air act is needed.

Q’s  what percentage of the problem is caused by buses, diesel trains?

  • over 50% in York.
  • Taxis are also a problem
  • HGV’s in particular areas

There are no financial incentives to buy petrol over diesel  (I’m not sure there should be- electric cars and bikes maybe.)

Light vans can be electric.

Hybrid tech is developing

This field could be a lever for regeneration of U.K. manufacturing

Cost is irrelevant in terms of the legislation.

  • It’s time to apply pressure onto LAs – please clarify with the government what they need to do to ensure compliance.
  • But risk that bus companies will cascade bus fleets to non compliant areas.

What impact will Brexit have? It is EU regulations that are being broken.

What was the impact of Black Friday, post-Xmas sales?

UWE report says that waiting for tech solutions won’t work.

  • councils are up against the buffers for revenue. (They could be raising revenue on polluter pays basis).

Air quality policy strategy  could be a necessary criteria for bail-outs (combined authorities)

Fleet procurement, modal shift, demand management.

Government strategy is about economic growth and jobs.

We must move forward with electric vehicles more quickly.

  1. Transport for the North.
  • is a membership body.

Strategy & vision comes from the Northern Powerhouse.

Formal consultation will be in spring 2018,

On the agenda:

Autonomous vehicles

Smart ticketing.

Road-rail

International

Freight.

CBT – has been engaged to produce a challenges and opportunities report.

Focusing on strategic not local issues.

Carbon reduction

Air quality

Network connectivity and integration

There are positive challenges.

Hopefully this will be a positive process and involve local people.

Attitude to TfN may have changed with new govt.

Timetable for phase 2 – January start.

Landscape Quality is an important issue for the North – tourism, outdoor pursuits

Network Rail has run out of money and is disbanding the teams with skills to undertake rail development in the north of England. Resource is moving south so NR can meet their commitments on GWR etc.

Walking and cycling seems to be a long way down on TfN’s agenda.

Smart ticketing seems like one thing TfN actually could deliver.

Are the modes being equally dealt with? It would seem not and we should make sure we get that point made.

Best way to get views represented is to get them into Bridget ASAP.

In Jan/Feb, however, there will be another opportunity to comment. To Amy bcc Bridget.

Very short timescales which is not CBT’s fault.

Clause 8. – says that TfN  must have regard to the results of the public consultation

So far we feel that there has not been enough consideration given to the Social and Environmental impact of strategy. E.g. Carbon impact of new projects, A66/69

Climate Change Act.

What are the other (road) lobby groups doing? Grubby handshakes behind locked doors I suspect,

Is the TFN Board open to the public? AR will check.

DM Suggested we get a Client Earth person up to talk to us.

Exploring legal action to get LA’s to meet their obligations.

  1. Tees Valley – very poorly served by rail even by comparison with other Northern areas.
  1. Greater Manchester spatial strategy will be the template for other studies commissioned by the LEPs.

Study envisages massive house building.

Targets for using brownfield are lower than ever.

Andy Burnham has reservations – he is most likely mayor. This Shows the potential importance of having a mayor.

Manchester has unprecedented local powers on health and other areas.

Simon

(Representing:-

Northern Cycle-Rail Forum

Friends Of the TPT

Cyclenation, Bike-Rail Rep.

Cycling UK Right to Ride for Sheffield.

Sustrans Volunteers Sheffield

University of Sheffield Cycle Forum)

Leave a Reply